Abstract
This article places the British and American postal telegraph movements in the broader context of a transatlantic reform tradition. More specifically, British nationalization in 1870 gave American reformers both a rallying point and a rationale for postalizing the telegraphs. The legacies of both movements were mixed. In Britain, the postal telegraph provided inexpensive and accessible service, but it soon ran a large deficit and retarded the development of the telephone industry. In the United States, reformers failed to nationalize the telegraph or to secure a place in historical memory, but they succeeded in pressuring Western Union to provide better service, and they provided the impetus for the municipal ownership movement of the Progressive Era.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 739-761 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Enterprise and Society |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of the Postal Telegraph Movement in Great Britain and the United States, 1866–1900'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver