Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A review and comparison of three neuronavigation systems for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Wake Forest University
  • Medical University of South Carolina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Advances in stereotactic navigation technology have helped to improve the ease, reliability, and workflow of neurosurgical intraoperative navigation. These advances have also allowed novel, minimally invasive neurosurgical techniques to emerge. Minimally invasive techniques for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation, including endoscopic evacuation and passive catheter drainage, are notable examples, and as these gain support in the literature and their use expands, stereotactic navigation will take on an increasingly important and central role. Each neurosurgical navigation system has unique characteristics. Operators may find that certain aspects are more important than others, depending on the environment in which the evacuation is performed and operator preferences. This review will describe the characteristics of three popular stereotactic neuronavigation systems and compare their advantages and disadvantages as they relate to minimally invasive ICH evacuation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-74
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review and comparison of three neuronavigation systems for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this