Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?

  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of Review: To evaluate the state of mentorship in the field of urology. Recent Findings: Mentorship has been shown to decrease burnout, increase recruitment of underrepresented minority groups, and have a positive influence on the career trajectory of mentees. Approximately half of surgical residency programs have mentorship programs. The current literature supports the idea that formal mentorship programs are successful based on level 1 satisfaction scores. However, studies are sparse and of low quality. Mentorship program success is rarely objectively measured. Summary: Structured mentorship programs appear to be beneficial, but require serious planning, evaluation, and ongoing support without which the programs can fail. Future research should be focused on objective and measurable metrics of success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-392
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent Urology Reports
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Medical education
  • Mentee
  • Mentor
  • Mentorship
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Review of Mentorship in Urology: Are We Satisfied?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this