Abstract
High school principals' acceptability ratings of three school-based programs for the prevention of adolescent suicide were examined. From a random sample of members from the 1994-1995 membership directory of the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), a total of 185 (40%) respondents completed the Suicide Prevention Program Rating Profile (SPPRP), a measure designed to evaluate the acceptability of suicide prevention programs, after reading a description of a particular prevention program. Programs evaluated for their acceptability included (1) curriculum- based programs presented to students, (2) in-service presentations to school staff, and (3) student self-report screening measures. The results indicated that the curriculum-based and staff in-service programs were significantly more acceptable to principals than was the schoolwide student screening program. No significant differences between the acceptability of curriculum- based and in-service programs were found. Limitations of the study and implications for practice and research are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 72-85 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescent suicide prevention: Acceptability of school-based programs among secondary school principals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver