Another look at the ho−lee bond option pricing model

Young Shin Kim; Stoyan V. Stoyanov; Svetlozar T. Rachev; Frank J. Fabozzi

doi:10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048

Another look at the ho−lee bond option pricing model

Young Shin Kim
, Stoyan V. Stoyanov
, Svetlozar T. Rachev
, Frank J. Fabozzi

Dean's Office, College of Business

Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this article, we extend the classical Ho–Lee binomial term structure model to the case of time-dependent parameters and, as a result, resolve a drawback associated with the model. This is achieved with the introduction of a more flexible no-arbitrage condition in contrast to the one assumed in the Ho–Lee model.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	48-53
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Derivatives
Volume	25
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048
State	Published - Jun 1 2018

Access to Document

10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048

Cite this

@article{c62776cfb5634ee8acdaf366191b3d02,

title = "Another look at the ho−lee bond option pricing model",

abstract = "In this article, we extend the classical Ho–Lee binomial term structure model to the case of time-dependent parameters and, as a result, resolve a drawback associated with the model. This is achieved with the introduction of a more flexible no-arbitrage condition in contrast to the one assumed in the Ho–Lee model.",

author = "Kim, \{Young Shin\} and Stoyanov, \{Stoyan V.\} and Rachev, \{Svetlozar T.\} and Fabozzi, \{Frank J.\}",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "48--53",

journal = "Journal of Derivatives",

issn = "1074-1240",

publisher = "Portfolio Management Research",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another look at the ho−lee bond option pricing model

AU - Kim, Young Shin

AU - Stoyanov, Stoyan V.

AU - Rachev, Svetlozar T.

AU - Fabozzi, Frank J.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - In this article, we extend the classical Ho–Lee binomial term structure model to the case of time-dependent parameters and, as a result, resolve a drawback associated with the model. This is achieved with the introduction of a more flexible no-arbitrage condition in contrast to the one assumed in the Ho–Lee model.

AB - In this article, we extend the classical Ho–Lee binomial term structure model to the case of time-dependent parameters and, as a result, resolve a drawback associated with the model. This is achieved with the introduction of a more flexible no-arbitrage condition in contrast to the one assumed in the Ho–Lee model.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85049140569

U2 - 10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048

DO - 10.3905/jod.2018.25.4.048

M3 - Article

SN - 1074-1240

VL - 25

SP - 48

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Derivatives

JF - Journal of Derivatives

IS - 4

ER -

Another look at the ho−lee bond option pricing model

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this