Abstract
By 1958, the Anthropology Department at the University of Michigan had emerged as a major center in the discipline. Its excellence derived from a strong faculty, commitment to an integrated view of the field, and broader support from a rising national tide of scholarship. While many new intellectual currents developed, among the strongest was biological-behavioral theory-somewhat ironically flourishing in a biological anthropology program that viewed itself as a nexus of population genetics. The biological anthropology faculty thought like anthropologists. From this environment, Frank Livingstone not only drew intellectual support, but also became a key player in demonstrating the importance of historical and cultural factors to shaping biological patterns. A biocultural perspective is evident in Michigan research to this day.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 619-624 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Human Biology |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2003 |
Keywords
- Anthropology
- History
- Physical anthropology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropology at the University of Michigan in the Late 1950s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver