Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Aromaticity: Quo Vadis

  • Gabriel Merino
  • , Miquel Solà
  • , Israel Fernández
  • , Cina Foroutan-Nejad
  • , Paolo Lazzeretti
  • , Gernot Frenking
  • , Harry L. Anderson
  • , Dage Sundholm
  • , Fernando P. Cossío
  • , Marina A. Petrukhina
  • , Jishan Wu
  • , Judy I. Wu
  • , Albeiro Restrepo
  • Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional
  • University of Girona
  • Complutense University
  • Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • University of Salerno
  • University of Marburg
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Helsinki
  • University of the Basque Country
  • National University of Singapore
  • University of Houston
  • Universidad de Antioquia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

162 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aromaticity is one of the most deeply rooted concepts in chemistry. But why, if two-thirds of existing compounds can be classified as aromatic, is there no consensus on what aromaticity is? σ−, π−, δ−, spherical, Möbius, or all-metal aromaticity… why are so many attributes needed to specify a property? Is aromaticity a dubious concept? This perspective aims to reflect where the aromaticity community is and where it is going.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5569-5576
Number of pages8
JournalChemical Science
Volume14
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 22 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aromaticity: Quo Vadis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this