Abstract
Specialized hospital physicians have direct capacity to impact Australia’s sub-optimal organ donation rates because of their responsibility to identify and facilitate donation opportunities. Australian physicians’ attitudes toward this responsibility are examined. A total of 12 intensive care unit and three emergency department physicians were interviewed using a constructionist grounded theory and situational analysis approach. A major theme emerged, related to physicians’ conflicts of interest in maintaining patients’/next-of-kin’s best interests and a sense of duty-of-care in this context. Two sub-themes related to this main theme were identified as follows: (1) discussions about organ donation and who is best to carry these out and (2) determining whether organ donation is part of end-of-life care; including the avoidance of non-therapeutic ventilation; and some reluctance to follow clinical triggers in the emergency department. Overall, participants indicated strong support for organ donation but would not consider it part of end-of-life care, representing a major obstacle to the support of potential donation opportunities. Findings have implications for physician education and training. Continued efforts are needed to integrate the potential for organ donation into end-of-life care within intensive care units and emergency departments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1601-1611 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Psychology |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 10-11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Keywords
- clinical practice patterns
- end-of-life care
- ethical issues
- healthcare provider attitudes
- organ and tissue donation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes of intensive care and emergency physicians in Australia with regard to the organ donation process: A qualitative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver