Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Captivation, Representation, and the Limits of Cognition: Interpreting Metaphor and Metonymy in Tahitian Tamau

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter considers the role of metaphor and metonym in visual representation by conjoining Alfred Gell’s two primary modes of agency. Metaphor and metonymy stimulate the mind, provoking the imagination and creating understanding in sometimes new and unexpected ways. The physical characteristics of tamau, plus the contexts in which they appeared, suggest that the skeins of braided hair indexed the lineage of the artist and the wearer through visual metaphors and metonyms. The tamau works metonymically to represent the lineage because each body, each person, was both the summation and the dissemination of the lineage in Tahitian society. Like metaphor, metonymy exercises the imagination in that it asks the viewer to follow the artist’s creative process of selection. Metaphor and metonymy make clear the contextual and interpretative nature of even such a fundamental process as identifying the prototype represented by the indexical artwork.
Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationBeyond Aesthetics
PublisherRoutledge
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Captivation, Representation, and the Limits of Cognition: Interpreting Metaphor and Metonymy in Tahitian Tamau'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this