Abstract
An accurate and computationally efficient means of classifying electromyographic (EMG) signal patterns has been the subject of considerable research effort in recent years. Quantitative analysis of EMG signals provides an important source of information for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Following the recent development of computer-aided EMG equipment, different methodologies in the time domain and frequency domain have been followed for quantitative analysis. In this study, feedforward error backpropagation artificial neural networks (FEBANN) and wavelet neural networks (WNN) based classifiers were developed and compared in relation to their accuracy in classification of EMG signals. In these methods, we used an autoregressive (AR) model of EMG signals as an input to classification system. A total of 1200 MUPs obtained from 7 normal subjects, 7 subjects suffering from myopathy and 13 subjects suffering from neurogenic disease were analyzed. The success rate for the WNN technique was 90.7% and for the FEBANN technique 88%. The comparisons between the developed classifiers were primarily based on a number of scalar performance measures pertaining to the classification. The WNN-based classifier outperformed the FEBANN counterpart. The proposed WNN classification may support expert decisions and add weight to EMG differential diagnosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 360-367 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Neuroscience Methods |
| Volume | 156 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 30 2006 |
Keywords
- Autoregressive method (AR)
- Electromyography (EMG)
- Motor unit potential (MUP)
- Wavelet neural networks (WNNs)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Classification of EMG signals using wavelet neural network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver