Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Climate, food and humans predict communities of mammals in the United States

  • Roland Kays
  • , Matthew H. Snider
  • , George Hess
  • , Michael V. Cove
  • , Alex Jensen
  • , Hila Shamon
  • , William J. McShea
  • , Brigit Rooney
  • , Maximilian L. Allen
  • , Charles E. Pekins
  • , Christopher C. Wilmers
  • , Mary E. Pendergast
  • , Austin M. Green
  • , Justin Suraci
  • , Matthew S. Leslie
  • , Sophie Nasrallah
  • , Dan Farkas
  • , Mark Jordan
  • , Melissa Grigione
  • , Michael C. LaScaleia
  • Miranda L. Davis, Chris Hansen, Josh Millspaugh, Jesse S. Lewis, Michael Havrda, Robert Long, Kathryn R. Remine, Kodi J. Jaspers, Diana J.R. Lafferty, Tru Hubbard, Colin E. Studds, Erika L. Barthelmess, Katherine Andy, Andrea Romero, Brian J. O'Neill, Melissa T.R. Hawkins, Jason V. Lombardi, Maksim Sergeyev, M. Caitlin Fisher-Reid, Michael S. Rentz, Christopher Nagy, Jon M. Davenport, Christine C. Rega-Brodsky, Cara L. Appel, Damon B. Lesmeister, Sean T. Giery, Christopher A. Whittier, Jesse M. Alston, Chris Sutherland, Christopher Rota, Thomas Murphy, Thomas E. Lee, Alessio Mortelliti, Dylan L. Bergman, Justin A. Compton, Brian D. Gerber, Jess Burr, Kylie Rezendes, Brett A. DeGregorio, Nathaniel H. Wehr, John F. Benson, M. Teague O'Mara, David S. Jachowski, Morgan Gray, Dean E. Beyer, Jerrold L. Belant, Robert V. Horan, Robert C. Lonsinger, Kellie M. Kuhn, Steven C.M. Hasstedt, Marketa Zimova, Sophie M. Moore, Daniel J. Herrera, Sarah Fritts, Andrew J. Edelman, Elizabeth A. Flaherty, Tyler R. Petroelje, Sean A. Neiswenter, Derek R. Risch, Fabiola Iannarilli, Marius van der Merwe, Sean P. Maher, Zach J. Farris, Stephen L. Webb, David S. Mason, Marcus A. Lashley, Andrew M. Wilson, John P. Vanek, Samuel R. Wehr, L. Mike Conner, James C. Beasley, Helen L. Bontrager, Carolina Baruzzi, Susan N. Ellis-Felege, Mike D. Proctor, Jan Schipper, Katherine C.B. Weiss, Andrea K. Darracq, Evan G. Barr, Peter D. Alexander, Çağan H. Şekercioğlu, Daniel A. Bogan, Christopher M. Schalk, Jean E. Fantle-Lepczyk, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Scott LaPoint, Laura S. Whipple, Helen Ivy Rowe, Kayleigh Mullen, Tori Bird, Adam Zorn, La Roy Brandt, Richard G. Lathrop, Craig McCain, Anthony P. Crupi, James Clark, Arielle Parsons
  • North Carolina State University
  • North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences
  • Clemson University
  • Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • United States Army Garrison
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • University of Utah
  • Sageland Collaborative
  • Inc.
  • United States Geological Survey
  • Swarthmore College
  • Cornell University
  • Pace University
  • Seattle University
  • University of Connecticut
  • University of Montana
  • Arizona State University
  • University of Washington
  • Woodland Park Zoo
  • Northern Michigan University
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County
  • St. Lawrence University
  • Simon Fraser University
  • University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  • State of California
  • Colorado State University
  • Bridgewater State University
  • Iowa State University
  • Mianus River Gorge
  • Appalachian State University
  • Pittsburg State University
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • Oregon State University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Tufts University
  • University of Arizona
  • University of St Andrews
  • West Virginia University
  • Edmonds Community College
  • Abilene Christian University
  • University of Maine
  • University of Trieste
  • Point No Point Treaty Council
  • Stonehill College
  • University of Rhode Island
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Bat Conservation International
  • Southeastern Louisiana University
  • Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior
  • Pepperwood Foundation
  • Wildlife Resources Division
  • Oklahoma State University
  • United States Air Force Academy
  • Ohio University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Humane Rescue Alliance
  • Texas State University
  • University of West Georgia
  • Purdue University
  • Michigan Department of Community Health
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas
  • University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Utah Tech University
  • Missouri State University
  • Texas A&M University
  • University of Florida
  • Gettysburg College
  • Northern Illinois University
  • SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
  • Oberlin College
  • The Jones Center at Ichauway
  • University of Georgia
  • University of North Dakota
  • Noble Research Institute
  • Arizona Center for Nature Conservation
  • Murray State University
  • Craighead Beringia South
  • Koc University
  • Sienna College
  • Auburn University
  • Black Rock Forest
  • McDowell Sonoran Conservancy
  • Northern Arizona University
  • Utah's Hogle Zoo
  • University of Mount Union
  • Lincoln Memorial University
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of North Texas
  • Alaska Department of Fish and Game
  • Duke University
  • Lincoln Park Zoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: The assembly of species into communities and ecoregions is the result of interacting factors that affect plant and animal distribution and abundance at biogeographic scales. Here, we empirically derive ecoregions for mammals to test whether human disturbance has become more important than climate and habitat resources in structuring communities. Location: Conterminous United States. Time Period: 2010–2021. Major Taxa Studied: Twenty-five species of mammals. Methods: We analysed data from 25 mammal species recorded by camera traps at 6645 locations across the conterminous United States in a joint modelling framework to estimate relative abundance of each species. We then used a clustering analysis to describe 8 broad and 16 narrow mammal communities. Results: Climate was the most important predictor of mammal abundance overall, while human population density and agriculture were less important, with mixed effects across species. Seed production by forests also predicted mammal abundance, especially hard-mast tree species. The mammal community maps are similar to those of plants, with an east–west split driven by different dominant species of deer and squirrels. Communities vary along gradients of temperature in the east and precipitation in the west. Most fine-scale mammal community boundaries aligned with established plant ecoregions and were distinguished by the presence of regional specialists or shifts in relative abundance of widespread species. Maps of potential ecosystem services provided by these communities suggest high herbivory in the Rocky Mountains and eastern forests, high invertebrate predation in the subtropical south and greater predation pressure on large vertebrates in the west. Main Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of climate to modern mammals and suggest that climate change will have strong impacts on these communities. Our new empirical approach to recognizing ecoregions has potential to be applied to expanded communities of mammals or other taxa.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13900
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • climate
  • macroecology
  • mammal communities
  • masting
  • species distribution models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climate, food and humans predict communities of mammals in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this