Abstract
In a series of papers [1], it has been claimed that evanescent waves contribute to the far field of a radiating dipole, i.e. that the amplitude of the sum of the evanescent waves decreases as 1/r with increasing distance, r, from the dipole. In spite of the fact that three recent papers [2] have demonstrated that these claims are incorrect and that they contradict well-established results relating to the farzone behavior of the angular spectrum representation of wavefields [3], the author continues to repeat this claim, most recently in a note with the title ‘Evanescent waves do contribute to the field’. It is the purpose of this note to point out an error in the previous publications [1] which has led to this erroneous conclusion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 757-758 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Modern Optics |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on the paper: Evanescent waves do contribute to the far field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver