Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of decision tree algorithms for EMG signal classification using DWT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

272 Scopus citations

Abstract

Decision tree algorithms are extensively used in machine learning field to classify biomedical signals. De-noising and feature extraction methods are also utilized to get higher classification accuracy. The goal of this study is to find an effective machine learning method for classifying ElectroMyoGram (EMG) signals by applying de-noising, feature extraction and classifier. This study presents a framework for classification of EMG signals using multiscale principal component analysis (MSPCA) for de-noising, discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for feature extraction and decision tree algorithms for classification. The presented framework automatically classifies the EMG signals as myopathic, ALS or normal, using CART, C4.5 and random forest decision tree algorithms. Results are compared by using numerous performance measures such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-measure and area under ROC curve (AUC). Combination of DWT and random forest achieved the best performance using k-fold cross-validation with 96.67% total classification accuracy. These results demonstrate that the proposed approach has the capability for the classification of EMG signals with a good accuracy. In addition, the proposed framework can be used to support clinicians for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-144
Number of pages7
JournalBiomedical Signal Processing and Control
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2015

Keywords

  • C4.5
  • CART
  • Discrete wavelet transform (DWT)
  • Electromyography (EMG)
  • Motor unit action potentials (MUAPs)
  • Multi-scale principle component analysis (MSPCA)
  • Random forest

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of decision tree algorithms for EMG signal classification using DWT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this