Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Competing Emergencies: A Policy Analysis of the Opioid Epidemic during COVID-19

  • Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas
  • City University of New York

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The response to COVID-19 brought rapid policy change to substance-use services in the US and redefined its street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) as essential workers. What effect did policy changes have on SLB discretion and roles? This article examines policies prior to and after the onset of the pandemic and analyzes the implications for practice through interviews with managerial and executive staff in the substance-use field in New York State. In governments’ attempt to balance the risk of competing emergencies, the effects of the simultaneous extension and contraction of different types of discretion on organizations and their frontline workers are shown. Note: In the interests of space, street-level theory and the pandemic context underpinning the articles for this Special Issue are discussed in detail in the Introduction to the Issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-94
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • SLB roles
  • United States
  • comparative policy analysis
  • discretion
  • opioid crisis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Emergencies: A Policy Analysis of the Opioid Epidemic during COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this