Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Complex receptive fields in primary visual cortex

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the early 1960s, Hubel and Wiesel reported the first physiological description of cells in cat primary visual cortex. They distinguished two main cell types: simple cells and complex cells. Based on their distinct response properties, they suggested that the two cell types could represent two consecutive stages in receptive-field construction. Since the 1960s, new experimental and computational evidence provided serious alternatives to this hierarchical model. Parallel models put forward the idea that both simple and complex receptive fields could be built in parallel by direct geniculate inputs. Recurrent models suggested that simple cells and complex cells may not be different cell types after all. To this day, a consensus among hierarchical, parallel, and recurrent models has been difficult to attain; however, the circuitry used by all models is becoming increasingly similar. The authors review theoretical and experimental evidence for each line of models emphasizing their strengths and weaknesses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-331
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroscientist
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Keywords

  • Cortical circuitry
  • Corticocortical
  • Striate cortex
  • Thalamocortical
  • Thalamus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complex receptive fields in primary visual cortex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this