Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Concretizing plan specifications as realizables within the OBO foundry

  • William D. Duncan
  • , Matthew Diller
  • , Damion Dooley
  • , William R. Hogan
  • , John Beverley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Within the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry, many ontologies represent the execution of a plan specification as a process in which a realizable entity that concretizes the plan specification, a “realizable concretization” (RC), is realized. This representation, which we call the “RC-account”, provides a straightforward way to relate a plan specification to the entity that bears the realizable concretization and the process that realizes the realizable concretization. However, the adequacy of the RC-account has not been evaluated in the scientific literature. In this manuscript, we provide this evaluation and, thereby, give ontology developers sound reasons to use or not use the RC-account pattern. Results: Analysis of the RC-account reveals that it is not adequate for representing failed plans. If the realizable concretization is flawed in some way, it is unclear what (if any) relation holds between the realizable entity and the plan specification. If the execution (i.e., realization) of the realizable concretization fails to carry out the actions given in the plan specification, it is unclear under the RC-account how to directly relate the failed execution to the entity carrying out the instructions given in the plan specification. These issues are exacerbated in the presence of changing plans. Conclusions: We propose two solutions for representing failed plans. The first uses the Common Core Ontologies ‘prescribed by’ relation to connect a plan specification to the entity or process that utilizes the plan specification as a guide. The second, more complex, solution incorporates the process of creating a plan (in the sense of an intention to execute a plan specification) into the representation of executing plan specifications. We hypothesize that the first solution (i.e., use of ‘prescribed by’) is adequate for most situations. However, more research is needed to test this hypothesis as well as explore the other solutions presented in this manuscript.

Original languageEnglish
Article number15
JournalJournal of Biomedical Semantics
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Common core ontologies
  • Failed plans
  • Information artifact ontology
  • OBO foundry
  • Ontology
  • Ontology for biomedical investigations
  • Plan specification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concretizing plan specifications as realizables within the OBO foundry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this