Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consensus proposal for revised International Working Group 2023 response criteria for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

  • Amer M. Zeidan
  • , Uwe Platzbecker
  • , Jan Philipp Bewersdorf
  • , Maximilian Stahl
  • , Lionel Adès
  • , Uma Borate
  • , David Bowen
  • , Rena Buckstein
  • , Andrew Brunner
  • , Hetty E. Carraway
  • , Naval Daver
  • , Maria Díez-Campelo
  • , Theo de Witte
  • , Amy E. DeZern
  • , Fabio Efficace
  • , Guillermo Garcia-Manero
  • , Jacqueline S. Garcia
  • , Ulrich Germing
  • , Aristoteles Giagounidis
  • , Elizabeth A. Griffiths
  • Robert P. Hasserjian, Eva Hellström-Lindberg, Marcelo Iastrebner, Rami Komrokji, Austin G. Kulasekararaj, Luca Malcovati, Yasushi Miyazaki, Olatoyosi Odenike, Valeria Santini, Guillermo Sanz, Phillip Scheinberg, Reinhard Stauder, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Andrew H. Wei, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Pierre Fenaux
  • Yale University
  • Leipzig University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Harvard University
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Ohio State University
  • St James's Institute of Oncology
  • University of Toronto
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • St Mary's Hospital
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • King's College Hospital
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Nagasaki University
  • The University of Chicago
  • University of Florence
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
  • Hospital A Beneficência Portuguesa
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
  • University of Miami

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes/myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are associated with variable clinical presentations and outcomes. The initial response criteria developed by the International Working Group (IWG) in 2000 have been used in clinical practice, clinical trials, regulatory reviews, and drug labels. Although the IWG criteria were revised in 2006 and 2018 (the latter focusing on lower-risk disease), limitations persist in their application to higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) and their ability to fully capture the clinical benefits of novel investigational drugs or serve as valid surrogates for longer-term clinical end points (eg, overall survival). Further, issues related to the ambiguity and practicality of some criteria lead to variability in interpretation and interobserver inconsistency in reporting results from the same sets of data. Thus, we convened an international panel of 36 MDS experts and used an established modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations for updated response criteria that would be more reflective of patient-centered and clinically relevant outcomes in HR-MDS. Among others, the IWG 2023 criteria include changes in the hemoglobin threshold for complete remission (CR), the introduction of CR with limited count recovery and CR with partial hematologic recovery as provisional response criteria, the elimination of marrow CR, and specific recommendations for the standardization of time-to-event end points and the derivation and reporting of responses. The updated criteria should lead to a better correlation between patient-centered outcomes and clinical trial results in an era of multiple emerging new agents with novel mechanisms of action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2047-2061
Number of pages15
JournalBlood
Volume141
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 27 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus proposal for revised International Working Group 2023 response criteria for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this