Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Construct and concurrent validation of the MG-QOL15 in the practice setting

  • Ted M. Burns
  • , C. K. Grouse
  • , Mark R. Conaway
  • , Donald B. Sanders
  • , Guillermo Solorzano
  • , Maria E. Farrugia
  • , Janice M. Massey
  • , Vern C. Juel
  • , Lisa D. Hobson-Webb
  • , Bernadette Tucker-Lipscomb
  • , Carlo Antozzi
  • , Renato Mantegazza
  • , David Lacomis
  • , Elliot Dimberg
  • , Srikanth Muppidi
  • , Gil Wolfe
  • , Mazen M. Dimachkie
  • , Richard J. Barohn
  • , Mamatha Pasnoor
  • , April L. McVey
  • Laura Herbelin, Tahseen Mozaffar, Vinh Q. Dang, Sandhya Rao, Robert Pascuzzi, Riley Snook, Anthony A. Amato
  • University of Virginia
  • Duke University
  • Institute of Neurological Sciences
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta - Milano
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Mayo Clinic Florida
  • University of Texas System
  • University of Kansas
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Harvard University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) estimates can play an important role in patient care by providing information about the patient's perception of impairment and disability and the degree to which the patient tolerates disease manifestations. The 15-item myasthenia gravis quality of life scale (MG-QOL15) is an HRQOL evaluative instrument specific to patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) that was designed to be easy to administer and interpret. In this multicenter study we demonstrate the construct validity of the MG-QOL15 in the practice setting. To assess the construct validity, score distributions were examined for test items in different MG patient groups that represent the clinical spectrum of the disease. For example, patients in remission more frequently scored test items as normal than did patients in other groups. Patients with lower (better) MG composite scores also more frequently scored items as normal than did patients with higher (worse) scores. There was also appropriate correlation between the MG-QOL15 and the other MG-specific scales studied. The study findings shed light on what troubles MG patients. The MG-QOL15 has construct validity in the clinical practice setting and represents an efficient and valuable tool for assessing HRQOL for patients with MG.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-226
Number of pages8
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Keywords

  • 15-item myasthenia gravis quality of life scale (MG-QOL15)
  • Construct validity
  • Health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
  • Myasthenia gravis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Construct and concurrent validation of the MG-QOL15 in the practice setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this