Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consumption advisories for salmon based on risk of cancer and noncancer health effects

  • Xiaoyu Huang
  • , Ronald A. Hites
  • , Jeffery A. Foran
  • , Coreen Hamilton
  • , Barbara A. Knuth
  • , Steven J. Schwager
  • , David O. Carpenter
  • SUNY Albany
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Midwest Center for Environmental Science and Public Policy
  • AXYS Analytical Services Ltd.
  • Cornell University
  • Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

The levels of dioxins/furans, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and chlorinated pesticides were determined in farmed salmon for eight regions in Europe, North America, and South America, in salmon fillets purchased in 16 cities in Europe and North America, and in five species of wild Pacific salmon. Upon application of US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) methods for developing fish consumption advisories for cancer from mixtures of all of these substance for which USEPA has reported a cancer slope factor, the most stringent recommendation, for farmed salmon from northern Europe, was for consumption of at most one meal every 5 months in order to not exceed an elevated risk of cancer of more than 1 in 100,000. Farmed salmon from North and South America triggered advisories of between 0.4 and one meal per month. Retail market samples, in general, reflected levels found in regionally farmed fish, although much of the US salmon comes from Chile, which had somewhat lower contaminant levels than the North American farmed samples. Upon consideration of all of these organochlorine compounds as a mixture, even wild Pacific salmon triggered advisories of between one and less than five meals per month. The advisories are driven by the nondioxin-like PCBs and pesticides and not by dioxins/furans and coplanar PCBs. For noncancer effects for contaminants where USEPA has provided a reference dose only endrin and PCBs triggered any significant advisory. For both of these in the worst case, farmed salmon from northern Europe, the advice was not more than three meals per month.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-274
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume101
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Keywords

  • Chlorinated pesticides
  • Dioxins
  • Endocrine disruption
  • Neurobehavioral effects
  • Polychlorinated biphenyls

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consumption advisories for salmon based on risk of cancer and noncancer health effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this