Abstract
We assess whether the COVID-19 vaccine induces COVID-19 risky behavior (e.g., going to bars and restaurants) and thus reduces vaccine efficacy. A key empirical challenge is the endogeneity bias when comparing risk-taking by vaccination status since people choose whether to get vaccinated. To address this bias, we exploit rich survey panel data on individuals followed before and after vaccine availability over fourteen months in an event study fixed effects model with individual, time, sector, and county-by-time fixed effects and inverse propensity weights. We find evidence that vaccinated persons, regardless of the timing of vaccination, increase their risk-taking activities. The evidence is consistent with the “lulling effect”. While vaccine availability may reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19, it also contributes to further spread of the virus by incentivizing risk-taking in the short term.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-49 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2024 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- I1
- I12
- I13
- I18
- Lulling effect
- Risk-taking
- Vaccine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19 vaccine and risk-taking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver