Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Criteria-referenced formative assessment in the arts

  • Fei Chen
  • , Angela M. Lui
  • , Heidi Andrade
  • , Christopher Valle
  • , Hirah Mir
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • SUNY Albany
  • 3M

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of criteria-referenced formative assessment on achievement in the arts. Seventy-five schools in New York City were assigned to either the treatment or control condition. The treatment involved 3195 elementary, middle, or high school students instructed by 43 music, visual arts, theater, or dance teachers. The teachers were involved in a professional development program focused on formative assessment practices, particularly criteria-referenced peer and self-assessment. The control group consisted of 2445 students in classes instructed by 32 teachers who did not receive the professional development. Discipline-specific, performance-based pre- and post-measures were used to evaluate student learning. Fidelity of implementation was examined before the analysis of the treatment effect. Propensity score matching analysis was used to examine group differences in performance on the post-assessment. Results based on a sample of 611 matched pairs of students showed that, overall, criteria-referenced formative assessment had a statistically significant, positive effect (d = .26) on students’ arts achievement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-314
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 7 2017

Keywords

  • Arts education
  • Criteria
  • Formative assessment
  • Peer assessment
  • Rubric
  • Self-assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria-referenced formative assessment in the arts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this