Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current status of clinical outcome measures in inclusion body myositis: a systematised review

  • International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Inclusion Body Myositis Scientific Interest Group
  • Yale University
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS
  • University of Manchester
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • Purdue University
  • University of South Alabama
  • Myositis Association
  • Leiden University
  • University College London
  • University of Washington
  • University of Göttingen
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Augusta University
  • Stanford University
  • University of Siena

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a debilitating idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) which affects hand function, ambulation, and swallowing. There is no approved pharmacological therapy for IBM, and there is a lack of suitable outcome measure to assess the effect of an intervention. The IBM scientific interest group under IMACS reviewed the previously used outcome measures in IBM clinical studies to lay the path for developing a core set of outcome measures in IBM. METHODS: In this systematised review, we have extracted all outcome measures reported in IBM clinical studies to determine what measures were being used and to assess the need for optimising outcome measures in IBM. RESULTS: We found 13 observational studies, 17 open-label clinical trials, and 15 randomised control trials (RCTs) in IBM. Six-minute walk distance, IBM-functional rating scale (IBM-FRS), quantitative muscle testing, manual muscle testing, maximal voluntary isometric contraction testing, and thigh muscle volume measured by MRI were used as primary outcome measures. Twelve different outcome measures of motor function were used in IBM clinical trials. IBM-FRS was the most used measure of functionality. Swallowing function was reported as a secondary outcome measure in only 3 RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: There are inconsistencies in using outcome measures in clinical studies in IBM. The core set measures developed by the IMACS group for other IIMs are not directly applicable to IBM. As a result, there is an unmet need for an IBM-specific core set of measures to facilitate the evaluation of new potential therapeutics for IBM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-378
Number of pages9
JournalClinical and Experimental Rheumatology
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current status of clinical outcome measures in inclusion body myositis: a systematised review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this