Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differentially variable component analysis: Identifying multiple evoked components using trial-to-trial variability

  • Kevin H. Knuth
  • , Ankoor S. Shah
  • , Wilson A. Truccolo
  • , Mingzhou Ding
  • , Steven L. Bressler
  • , Charles E. Schroeder
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Nathan Kline Institute
  • Yale University
  • Brown University
  • University of Florida
  • Florida Atlantic University
  • Columbia University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Electric potentials and magnetic fields generated by ensembles of synchronously active neurons, either spontaneously or in response to external stimuli, provide information essential to understanding the processes underlying cognitive and sensorimotor activity. Interpreting recordings of these potentials and fields is difficult because detectors record signals simultaneously generated by various regions throughout the brain. We introduce a novel approach to this problem, the differentially variable component analysis (dVCA) algorithm, which relies on trial-to-trial variability in response amplitude and latency to identify multiple components. Using simulations we demonstrate the importance of response variability to component identification, the robustness of dVCA to noise, and its ability to characterize single-trial data. We then compare the source-separation capabilities of dVCA with those of principal component analysis and independent component analysis. Finally, we apply dVCA to neural ensemble activity recorded from an awake, behaving macaque - demonstrating that dVCA is an important tool for identifying and characterizing multiple components in the single trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3257-3276
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume95
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differentially variable component analysis: Identifying multiple evoked components using trial-to-trial variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this