Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dignity and indignation: bridging morality and political economy in contemporary Spain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the current Spanish conjuncture, characterized by political and economic crisis and the rapid impoverishment of the working classes, we have seen the emergence of moral discourses around indignation and the demand of dignity. While these moral exhortations have rightly been scrutinized with skepticism from Marxist positions for their lack of attention to political economic structures, this paper discusses whether we can find in them elements for what Gavin Smith calls a “revindicative politics,” able to transcend the frame of reference of the society of capital. Exploring the notion of dignity both in the Indignados movement and in my own ethnographic field site of Southern Catalonia—a region where claims to dignity have saturated the sphere of the political for decades—I suggest that the demand for dignity should be understood as an expression of what Ernst Bloch called “nonsynchronous contradictions,” being not entirely reducible to the contemporary workings of capitalist accumulation. Dignity points toward unsettled memories and unfulfilled pasts as well as to a rejection of servile relations and the desire to make sense of oneself outside of the morality of capital. Understanding this demand for dignity forces Marxist anthropologists to look at capital from the “margins,” challenging its centrality. In so doing it also invites us to refine and invigorate our critique of political economy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-86
Number of pages18
JournalDialectical Anthropology
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Keywords

  • Catalonia
  • Dignity
  • Energy
  • Ernst Bloch
  • Indignados

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dignity and indignation: bridging morality and political economy in contemporary Spain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this