Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disaster experience and hospital information systems: An examination of perceived information assurance, risk, resilience, and his usefulness

  • Dakota State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper examines how an individual's disaster experience affects his or her perceptions of sociotechnical safety factors (risk, information assurance, resilience) and perceived usefulness of hospital information systems (HIS). This paper consists of two studies focusing on different aspects: a quasi-field experiment conducted with employees in three hospitals affected by a severe snowstorm (labeled a federal disaster) (N = 103), where we compare the perceptual factors in the context of the disaster experience (with versus without recall), and a comparative study between a first sample group (with disaster experience) and a second, contrast sample group (with no disaster experience) of hospital employees (N= 179) from two similar hospitals. The results show that the disaster experience changes the relationships among the perceptual factors that affect perceived usefulness. Individuals tend to perceive negative factors (such as risk) as having greater effects when they actually have direct experience in a disaster situation than in a normal situation. Positive factors (such as information assurance and resilience) have a lesser impact among individuals who have disaster experience (with versus without recall).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-344
Number of pages28
JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2015

Keywords

  • Comparative study
  • Disaster experience
  • Hospital information systems usefulness
  • Information assurance
  • Perceived resilience
  • Perceived system risk
  • Quasiexperiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disaster experience and hospital information systems: An examination of perceived information assurance, risk, resilience, and his usefulness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this