Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discussing multisource feedback with raters and performance improvement

  • James W. Smither
  • , Manuel London
  • , Richard R. Reilly
  • , Raymond Flautt
  • , Yvette Vargas
  • , Ivy Kucine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper hypothesized that ratees who share their multisource feedback with raters and ask for suggestions would improve more than other ratees. The participants were 5,335 ratees in a large, global corporation who received multisource feedback. Nine months after the initial survey, there was a follow-up survey in which raters indicated whether the feedback recipient had shared the feedback and asked for suggestions. One year after the initial survey, there was a second multisource feedback survey. It was found that sharing feedback and asking for suggestions accounted for only a very small (albeit statistically significant) proportion of variance in improvement over time. This paper discusses factors that may affect the impact of sharing feedback and asking for suggestions following multisource feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-468
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Management Development
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Business improvement
  • Feedback
  • Performance monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussing multisource feedback with raters and performance improvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this