Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disparities between ambient, standard lighting and retinal acuities in community-dwelling older people: Implications for disability

  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Long Island University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine three types of visual ability - ambient acuity, standard lighting acuity, and retinal acuity - and their relationship with self-reported disability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional prevalence survey. SETTING: New York, New York. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older people. MEASUREMENTS: Ambient acuity assessed using a near reading card; standard lighting acuity and retinal acuity assessed using the Retinal Acuity Meter. Difficulty in activities of daily living was assessed according to self-report. RESULTS: Mean logMAR acuities were 0.44 (20/56) for ambient acuity, 0.33 (20/44) for standard lighting acuity, and 0.19 (20/31) for retinal acuity (all pairwise differences, P<.001). Given the distribution of disability by ambient acuity in this sample, improving ambient acuity to the level of retinal acuity could potentially reduce self-care disability 22%. CONCLUSION: Better utilization of retinal acuity through optimal ophthalmologic care and improvement in lighting would likely reduce disability in older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1713-1718
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume54
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Lighting
  • Older adults
  • RAM
  • Retinal acuity
  • Retinal acuity meter
  • Screening
  • Vision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disparities between ambient, standard lighting and retinal acuities in community-dwelling older people: Implications for disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this