TY - CHAP
T1 - Distinguishing Failed from Incomplete Knowledge
AU - Tegtmeyer, Maximilian
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - I raise an example that suggests that Andrea Kern’s Knowledge View of Perception should concede that a mere perceptual experience can be a potentiality for one to know something on its basis. I argue that the Knowledge View can accommodate this suggestion by distinguishing between two kinds of defective exercises of a capacity for perceptual knowledge, namely failed and incomplete exercises. I explain that, rather than collapsing the Knowledge View into the contrary Two-Capacity View, my suggestion further articulates the definitive insight of the Knowledge View, namely that perceptual experience, on the basis of which one knows, issues from the same capacity as the knowledge enabled by it.
AB - I raise an example that suggests that Andrea Kern’s Knowledge View of Perception should concede that a mere perceptual experience can be a potentiality for one to know something on its basis. I argue that the Knowledge View can accommodate this suggestion by distinguishing between two kinds of defective exercises of a capacity for perceptual knowledge, namely failed and incomplete exercises. I explain that, rather than collapsing the Knowledge View into the contrary Two-Capacity View, my suggestion further articulates the definitive insight of the Knowledge View, namely that perceptual experience, on the basis of which one knows, issues from the same capacity as the knowledge enabled by it.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198363946
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-52231-4_17
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-52231-4_17
M3 - Chapter
T3 - Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
SP - 141
EP - 143
BT - Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
ER -