Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Dominating the battlespace”: Right-wing tactical performances and the spatial politics of postdemocracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the political right is a coherent object of analysis and a powerful presence in US politics, because it possesses a spatially-informed alternative theory and practice of society. We thus propose the concept of battlespace as an analytic to understand the political right’s project. The right constructs its alternative theory and practice of society, we argue, through spatial tactics that seek to generate collective experience around the feeling of embattlement. We then analyze the ways in which this collective experience is constructed for and with participants through tactical performances. We understand tactical performances as a constellation of creative, improvised, and adversarial actions that spatially create shared experiences among participants. We then trace three modalities of action – hostility, frontierization, and validation – that characterize the tactical performances of the political right. What unites the right against racial, gender, and sexual self-determination is its ability to forge a common identity and experience through an alternative vision of society. Tactical performances are enacted to nullify and threaten such heterogeneity and processes of pluralization. Finally, using the concept of postdemocracy, we discuss how these spatial tactics undermine democracy’s conditions of possibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-483
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Tactical performances
  • battlespace
  • embattlement
  • postdemocracy
  • right-wing politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Dominating the battlespace”: Right-wing tactical performances and the spatial politics of postdemocracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this