Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Lori M. Laffel
  • , Lauren G. Kanapka
  • , Roy W. Beck
  • , Katherine Bergamo
  • , Mark A. Clements
  • , Amy Criego
  • , Daniel J. Desalvo
  • , Robin Goland
  • , Korey Hood
  • , David Liljenquist
  • , Laurel H. Messer
  • , Roshanak Monzavi
  • , Thomas J. Mouse
  • , Priya Prahalad
  • , Jennifer Sherr
  • , Jill H. Simmons
  • , R. Paul Wadwa
  • , Ruth S. Weinstock
  • , Steven M. Willi
  • , Kellee M. Miller
  • Harvard University
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
  • Park Nicollet Health Services
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Columbia University
  • Stanford University
  • Rocky Mountain Diabetes and Osteoporosis Center
  • Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Yale Children's Diabetes Program
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

368 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes exhibit the worst glycemic control among individuals with type 1 diabetes across the lifespan. Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in adults, its benefit in adolescents and young adults has not been demonstrated. Objective: To determine the effect of CGM on glycemic control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted between January 2018 and May 2019 at 14 endocrinology practices in the US including 153 individuals aged 14 to 24 years with type 1 diabetes and screening hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.5% to 10.9%. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to undergo CGM (CGM group; n = 74) or usual care using a blood glucose meter for glucose monitoring (blood glucose monitoring [BGM] group; n = 79). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including additional HbA1c outcomes, CGM glucose metrics, and patient-reported outcomes with adjustment for multiple comparisons to control for the false discovery rate. Results: Among the 153 participants (mean [SD] age, 17 [3] years; 76 [50%] were female; mean [SD] diabetes duration, 9 [5] years), 142 (93%) completed the study. In the CGM group, 68% of participants used CGM at least 5 days per week in month 6. Mean HbA1c was 8.9% at baseline and 8.5% at 26 weeks in the CGM group and 8.9% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the BGM group (adjusted between-group difference, -0.37% [95% CI, -0.66% to -0.08%]; P =.01). Of 20 prespecified secondary outcomes, there were statistically significant differences in 3 of 7 binary HbA1c outcomes, 8 of 9 CGM metrics, and 1 of 4 patient-reported outcomes. The most commonly reported adverse events in the CGM and BGM groups were severe hypoglycemia (3 participants with an event in the CGM group and 2 in the BGM group), hyperglycemia/ketosis (1 participant with an event in CGM group and 4 in the BGM group), and diabetic ketoacidosis (3 participants with an event in the CGM group and 1 in the BGM group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring compared with standard blood glucose monitoring resulted in a small but statistically significant improvement in glycemic control over 26 weeks. Further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of the findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263494.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2388-2396
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume323
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 16 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this