Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of New York State regulatory action on benzodiazepine prescribing and hip fracture rates

  • Anita K. Wagner
  • , Dennis Ross-Degnan
  • , Jerry H. Gurwitz
  • , Fang Zhang
  • , Daniel B. Gilden
  • , Leon Cosler
  • , Stephen B. Soumerai
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • JEN Associates, Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Medicare Part D excludes benzodiazepines from coverage, and numerous state government policies limit use of benzodiazepines. No data indicate that such policies have decreased the incidence of hip fracture. Objective: To assess whether a statewide policy that decreased the use of benzodiazepines among elderly persons by more than 50% has decreased the incidence of hip fracture. Design: A quasi-experiment comparing changes in outcomes before and after a policy change in a study U.S. state (New York) and a control state (New Jersey). Setting: Two U.S. state Medicaid programs, 1988-1990. Patients: Medicaid enrollees in New York (n = 51 529) and New Jersey (n = 42 029) who received or did not receive a benzodiazepine. Measurements: Benzodiazepine prescribing and hazard ratios for hip fracture, adjusted for age and eligibility category. Intervention: A statewide policy, implemented in New York in 1989, that required triplicate forms for benzodiazepine prescribing to allow surveillance by health authorities. Results: The triplicate prescription policy immediately resulted in a 60.3% (95% CI, -66.3% to -54.2%) reduction in benzodiazepine use among women and 58.5% (-64.3% to -52.8%) among men. Benzodiazepine use in New Jersey remained stable. Hazard ratios for hip fracture that were adjusted for age and eligibility category did not change in New York or New Jersey when the periods before and after use of the triplicate prescription policy were compared (change from 1.2 to 1.1 among female benzodiazepine recipients [P = 0.70], 1.3 to 1.1 [P = 0.08] among female nonrecipients, 0.8 to 1.1 [P = 0.56] among male recipients, and 1.1 to 1.3 [P = 0.46] among male nonrecipients). Limitations: Information was lacking on race, benzodiazepine dose, and other potential determinants of continued benzodiazepine prescribing. Conclusions: Policies that lead to substantial reductions in the use of benzodiazepines among elderly persons do not necessarily lead to decreased incidence of hip fracture. Limitations on coverage of benzodiazepines under Medicare Part D may not achieve this widely assumed clinical benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-103
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume146
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 16 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of New York State regulatory action on benzodiazepine prescribing and hip fracture rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this