Abstract
In Exps III (224 male Sprague-Dawley rats), Ss were run in a complex maze to escape weak footshock or to approach an appetitive reinforcer. Extramaze intertrial reinstatement of the same reinforcer as that used in training was found to enhance subsequent maze performance. Exp IV (80 Ss) determined that appetitively and aversively motivated performance benefitted from brief intertrial exposures to the start box of the maze. In Exp V (64 Ss), a facilitatory effect indicated that memory trace activity need not be maintained between training and reinstatement or between reinstatement and subsequent training. Exp VI (80 Ss) examined the effects of reinstatement at the beginning, middle, or end of 5-min intertrial intervals and found enhanced performance in the last 2 conditions. Exp VII (24 Ss) established that 4 successive reinstatement treatments without interpolated training trials were no more beneficial than a single reinstatement. Exp VIII (16 Ss) determined that forgetting had occurred over the standard 5-min interval between training trials. Exp IX (32 Ss) found that reinstatement alleviated forgetting that had already transpired. (49 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 86-109 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1982 |
Keywords
- forgetting vs maze learning, male rats
- intertrial intervals, memory trace &
- intertrial reinstatement of reinforcement &
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of intertrial reinstatement of training stimuli on complex maze learning in rats: Evidence that "acquisition" curves reflect more than acquisition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver