Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed α/β protein: Characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9

  • Donna L. Luisi
  • , Brian Kuhlman
  • , Kostandinos Sideras
  • , Philip A. Evans
  • , Daniel P. Raleigh
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of Cambridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 forms a split βαβ structure with a long C-terminal helix. The folding transitions of a 56 residue version of this protein have previously been characterized, here we report the results of a study of a truncation mutant corresponding to residues 1-51. The 51 residue protein adopts the same fold as the 56 residue protein as judged by CD and two-dimensional NMX, but it is less stable as judged by chemical and thermal denaturation experiments. Studies with synthetic peptides demonstrate that the C-terminal helix of the 51 residue version has very little propensity to fold in isolation in contrast to the C-terminal helix of the 56 residue variant. The folding rates of the two proteins, as measured by stopped-flow fluorescence, are essentially identical, indicating that formation of local structure in the C-terminal helix is not involved in the rate-limiting step of folding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-174
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Volume289
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 28 1999

Keywords

  • Protein folding
  • Ribosomal protein L9
  • Two-state kinetics
  • α-helix

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed α/β protein: Characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this