TY - JOUR
T1 - Enabling Technologies for Pedicle Screw Placement in Pediatric Spine Surgery
AU - Pediatric Spine Study Group
AU - Nicholson, Katelyn S.
AU - Christianson, Eleanor A.
AU - Catanzano, Anthony A.
AU - Tuason, Dominick A.
AU - Bauer, David
AU - Montgomery, Blake
AU - Catanzano, Anthony
AU - Clement, Carter
AU - Ouellet, Jean
AU - Weinstein, Stuart
AU - Louer, Craig
AU - Segar, Anand
AU - Shah, Suken
AU - Morash, Kevin
AU - Shaw, Aaron
AU - Karlen, Judson
AU - Hughes, Michael
AU - Shirley, Otis
AU - Jea, Andrew
AU - Wilson, Nichola
AU - Baldwin, Margaret
AU - Kruyt, Moyo
AU - Cotton, Kenzo
AU - Orland, Keith
AU - Torrey, Lauren
AU - Holmes, Jennifer
AU - Roberto, Rolando Figueroa
AU - Braga, Bruno
AU - Rushton, Paul
AU - Huang, Eric
AU - Hryniuk, Sarah Southon
AU - Lebel, David
AU - Plachta, Stephen
AU - Baldwin, Keith
AU - Bezuidenhout, Louis
AU - Kulubya, Edwin
AU - Simmonds, Andrea
AU - Oh, Taemin
AU - St. Remy, Carl
AU - Meyer, Laura
AU - Henstenburg, Jeffrey
AU - Mathew, Smitha
AU - Keil, Lukas
AU - Noonan, Kenneth
AU - Stampe, Kyle
AU - Lim, Kevin
AU - Drake, Luke
AU - Stadler, Andy
AU - Albanese, Stephen
AU - Lavelle, William
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2026 The Authors
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Enabling technologies (ETs) have increasingly been developed and used in pediatric spine surgery over the past two decades, sparking ongoing discussion about their benefits and drawbacks. Relevant literature indicates that ETs can enhance pedicle screw safety and accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. However, steep learning curves initially lead to longer operative times, and the costs of implementing these technologies are significant. This review explores current ETs for pediatric pedicle screw placement, assessing their utility, advantages, limitations, and practical considerations for adoption. Technologies discussed include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic systems, and 3D-printed modeling systems used for pedicle screw placement. The article evaluates pedicle screw accuracy, surgical procedure time and complications, radiation exposure, surgeon safety, learning curves, costs, and technological limitations. Key Concepts: (1) ET methods for pedicle screw placement in pediatric spine surgery include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic assistance, and 3D-printed drill guides. (2) Implementing ETs in pediatric spine surgery can extend operative times and bring new challenges, including high initial costs, a steep learning curve, and technical difficulties. (3) Gaining proficiency in ETs may eventually decrease operative time, improve pedicle screw placement accuracy, facilitate education, and support surgeon well-being. (4) ETs may provide significant value in complex pediatric cases with severe deformities, small pedicles, and/or challenging anatomy. (5) Ideally, best practices can be achieved through collaboration with colleagues.
AB - Enabling technologies (ETs) have increasingly been developed and used in pediatric spine surgery over the past two decades, sparking ongoing discussion about their benefits and drawbacks. Relevant literature indicates that ETs can enhance pedicle screw safety and accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. However, steep learning curves initially lead to longer operative times, and the costs of implementing these technologies are significant. This review explores current ETs for pediatric pedicle screw placement, assessing their utility, advantages, limitations, and practical considerations for adoption. Technologies discussed include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic systems, and 3D-printed modeling systems used for pedicle screw placement. The article evaluates pedicle screw accuracy, surgical procedure time and complications, radiation exposure, surgeon safety, learning curves, costs, and technological limitations. Key Concepts: (1) ET methods for pedicle screw placement in pediatric spine surgery include stereotactic navigation, machine-vision navigation, robotic assistance, and 3D-printed drill guides. (2) Implementing ETs in pediatric spine surgery can extend operative times and bring new challenges, including high initial costs, a steep learning curve, and technical difficulties. (3) Gaining proficiency in ETs may eventually decrease operative time, improve pedicle screw placement accuracy, facilitate education, and support surgeon well-being. (4) ETs may provide significant value in complex pediatric cases with severe deformities, small pedicles, and/or challenging anatomy. (5) Ideally, best practices can be achieved through collaboration with colleagues.
KW - Enabling technology
KW - Navigation
KW - Pedicle screw
KW - Robotics
KW - Scoliosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028414913
U2 - 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100313
DO - 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100313
M3 - Review article
SN - 2768-2765
VL - 14
JO - Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
JF - Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America
M1 - 100313
ER -