Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enhancement and reduction of associative retroactive cue interference by training in multiple contexts

  • Universidad de Chile
  • State University of New York Binghamton University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Retroactive cue interference refers to situations in which a target cue X is paired with an outcome in phase 1 and a nontarget cue Z is paired with the same outcome in phase 2, with less subsequent responding to X being seen as a result of the phase 2 training. Two conditioned suppression experiments with rats were conducted to determine whether retroactive cue interference is similarly modulated by a manipulation that influences retroactive outcome interference (e.g., extinction). Both experiments used an ABC renewal-like design in which phase 1 training, phase 2 training, and testing each occurred in different contexts. Experiment 1 found that training the target association in multiple contexts without altering the number of training trials during phase 1 decreased retroactive cue interference (i.e., increased responding consistent with the target association). Experiment 2 found that training the interfering association in multiple contexts without altering the number of interference trials during phase 2 increased retroactive cue interference (i.e., decreased responding consistent with the target association). The possibility of similar mechanisms underlying cue interference and outcome interference is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-329
Number of pages12
JournalLearning and Behavior
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Associative interference
  • Contextual dependence
  • Cue interference
  • Renewal
  • Retroactive interference
  • Training in multiple contexts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancement and reduction of associative retroactive cue interference by training in multiple contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this