Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Error analysis and threat magnitude for carry-on bag inspection

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

A major part of aviation security research is prediction and improvement of systems performance to address different threat vectors. The current paper arises from the application of several ideas from the area of non-destructive inspection (NDI) to X-ray screening of carry-on baggage. The premise is that if findings from the security domain are similar to those in the NDI domain, then much prior research on inspection becomes directly applicable to security applications. Simulated threats were presented to 22 experts and 24 novices using 3 threat categories, 4 viewpoints and threats at 3 different image scales. Along with speed-accuracy trade-off, the applicability of "PoD Curve" analysis from NDI reliability was also explored along with individual differences. Results indicate support for speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO) and PoD models applied to security inspection, with large effects of expertise and smaller effects of age. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) also produced a different pattern from guns or knives indicating that studies should include IEDs to be broadly applicable.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, HFES 2006
Pages1189-1193
Number of pages5
StatePublished - 2006
Event50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006 - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Oct 16 2006Oct 20 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Conference

Conference50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2006
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period10/16/0610/20/06

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Error analysis and threat magnitude for carry-on bag inspection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this