Abstract
Recently, municipalities have been investing large sums of money, as well as much bureaucratic and professional effort, into making their cities not only more "treefull" places, but also places that survey, measure, regulate, and manage their trees. This article explores the transformation of the utilitarian discourse on trees, which focuses on the benefits of trees and greenery, into a normative discourse whereby trees are not only considered good but are also represented as if they are, or should be, loved by everybody. This transformation is not only the result of top-down governmental policies. It is also a consequence of longstanding romantic views of nature in the city - especially in the American city - facilitated by environmental organizations, local communities, and individual activists. Importantly, the attribution of morality to tree practices masks the clandestine project of governing the urban population, and the governmental control of urban crime in particular.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-118 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Sep 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Everybody loves trees" Policing American cities through street trees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver