Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence-based consensus on the clinical application of photobiomodulation

  • Jalal Maghfour
  • , Jessica Mineroff
  • , David M. Ozog
  • , Jared Jagdeo
  • , Henry W. Lim
  • , Indermeet Kohli
  • , Rox Anderson
  • , Kristen M. Kelly
  • , Andrew Mamalis
  • , Gilly Munavalli
  • , Ferraresi Cleber
  • , Daniel Siegel
  • , Ivayla Geneva
  • , Robert Weiss
  • , Akimich Morita
  • , Anders Juanita
  • , Mitchel P. Goldman
  • , Paraveen R. Arany
  • , David Sliney
  • , Omar A. Ibrahimi
  • Michael Chopp, Samia Esmat, Jan Tuner
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
  • Michigan State University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Kaiser Permanent
  • Dermatology Laser & Vein Specialists of the Carolinas
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos
  • Crouse Health Hospital
  • Skin and Vein Institute
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Nagoya City University
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Connecticut Skin Institute
  • Cairo University
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Michigan State University
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of California at San Diego
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of evidence-based consensus to assist clinicians in using photobiomodulation (PBM). Objective: To create a consensus on the safe and effective use of PBM. Methods: A systematic literature review of Embase and MEDLINE was conducted in June 2022 to identify publications reporting research on PBM. An international multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic search; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Results: A multidisciplinary panel of experts (n = 21) was assembled based on publication history. The key findings that informed the consensus developed by the expert panel were as follows: PBM is a safe treatment modality for adult patients and red light PBM does not induce DNA damage. PBM is an effective treatment option for peripheral neuropathy, androgenic alopecia, wound ulcers due to multiple etiologies, decubitus ulcers, pain attributed to diabetic foot ulcers, and acute radiation dermatitis. Conclusion: The systematic literature search and structured Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of PBM in medical and aesthetic applications. Future research will further bolster our understanding of this evolving noninvasive technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-443
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2025

Keywords

  • LLLT
  • PBM
  • acute radiation dermatitis
  • androgenic alopecia
  • cognition
  • cytochrome c oxidase
  • decubitus ulcers
  • low-level light therapy
  • musculoskeletal
  • near-infrared light
  • peripheral neuropathy
  • photobiomodulation
  • red light
  • sports performance
  • stroke
  • wound healing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based consensus on the clinical application of photobiomodulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this