Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From Fe32+δGe35-xPx to Fe32+δGe35-x-yPxAsy: Fine geometry optimization in new intergrowth structures

  • Roman A. Khalaniya
  • , Valeriy Yu Verchenko
  • , Zheng Wei
  • , Evgeny V. Dikarev
  • , Ivo Heinmaa
  • , Raivo Stern
  • , Anton Jesche
  • , Alexander A. Tsirlin
  • , Andrei V. Shevelkov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

A new compound with a two-dimensional intergrowth structure, Fe32+δGe35-xPx (x = 1.7–4.4, δ = 0.6–0.75), and the solid solution on its base, Fe32+δGe35-x-yPxAsy (δ < 0.2, x = 0–4.4, y = 0–2), were obtained by the two-stage synthesis from elements. The crystal structure of Fe32+δGe35-xPx can be described as an alternation of infinite columns of two intermetallic structure types: MgFe6Ge6 and Co2Al5. The characteristic feature of Fe32+δGe35-xPx is that P partially replaces Ge in one of the 6k sites in the MgFe6Ge6-type column and does not form the X2 dumbbells consisting of As atoms that are present in Fe32+δGe33As2. In the Fe32+δGe35-x-yPxAsy solid solution, P and As atoms occupy the same sites as in the initial Fe32+δGe35-xPx and Fe32+δGe33As2 compounds, respectively. The magnetic behavior of Fe32+δGe35-xPx is similar to that of Fe32+δGe33As2, and the antiferromagnetic transition is observed at TN ∼130 K.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-236
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Alloys and Compounds
Volume779
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 30 2019

Keywords

  • Antiferromagnetic ordering
  • Intergrowth structures
  • Intermetallics
  • Iron
  • Solid solution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Fe32+δGe35-xPx to Fe32+δGe35-x-yPxAsy: Fine geometry optimization in new intergrowth structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this