Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genocide, Politicide, and the Prospects of Democratization since 1900

  • Gary Uzonyi
  • , Nam Kyu Kim
  • , Nakissa Jahanbani
  • , Victor Asal
  • The University of Tennessee
  • Korea University
  • SUNY Albany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Why do some autocracies democratize? A country’s violent past has received little attention. We argue that genocide and politicide undermine democratization by binding the elites’ supporters more tightly to the governing power, while cementing in-group/out-group animosities, and helping preserve the elites’ status quo position within the state. We test this argument on a new dataset of government atrocity and democratization since 1900. These novel data allow us to capture many important instances of atrocity missed by others, and thus take a longer look at democratization and violence throughout history. We find that episodes of genocide and politicide are associated with a lower likelihood of democratization in both the short and long run. These effects are larger and more consistent than other common explanations for democratization. They also differ from the effects of non-genocidal civil war violence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1521-1550
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume65
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2021

Keywords

  • civil wars
  • democratization
  • genocide
  • polarization
  • political leadership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genocide, Politicide, and the Prospects of Democratization since 1900'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this