Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions

  • J. L. Broek
  • , E. A. Akl
  • , P. Alonso-Coello
  • , D. Lang
  • , R. Jaeschke
  • , J. W. Williams
  • , B. Phillips
  • , M. Lelgemann
  • , A. Lethaby
  • , J. Bousquet
  • , G. H. Guyatt
  • , H. J. Schünemann
  • IRCCS Istituti fisioterapici ospitalieri - Istituto Regina Elena
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Hospital de la Sant Pau
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédicaen Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • McMaster University
  • Duke University
  • University of York
  • University of Bremen
  • The University of Auckland
  • CHU Montpellier
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

743 Scopus citations

Abstract

The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach provides guidance to grading the quality of underlying evidence and the strength of recommendations in health care. The GRADE system's conceptual underpinnings allow for a detailed stepwise process that defines what role the quality of the available evidence plays in the development of health care recommendations. The merit of GRADE is not that it eliminates judgments or disagreements about evidence and recommendations, but rather that it makes them transparent. This first article in a three-part series describes the GRADE framework in relation to grading the quality of evidence about interventions based on examples from the field of allergy and asthma. In the GRADE system, the quality of evidence reflects the extent to which a guideline panel's confidence in an estimate of the effect is adequate to support a particular recommendation. The system classifies quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low according to factors that include the study methodology, consistency and precision of the results, and directness of the evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-677
Number of pages9
JournalAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Evidence based medicine
  • Grading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this