Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Great power politics and the dynamics of capability: the prevention of near-crisis escalation

  • Edward A. Gonzalez
  • , Anne van Wijk
  • , Shikshya Adhikari
  • , Victor Asal
  • , Kyle Beardsley
  • , Nakissa Jahanbani
  • , Patrick James
  • , Suzanne Weedon Levy
  • , Steven E. Lobell
  • , Norrin M. Ripsman
  • , Scott A. Silverstone
  • , Grace Sorci
  • New York University
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • Duke University
  • United States Military Academy
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of Utah
  • Lehigh University
  • SUNY Albany

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

How do changes in military capability among the great powers affect conflict processes? The authors argue that this relationship should be evaluated at a lower point in the conflict escalation cycle by focusing on near-crisis events. They develop propositions from the dynamics of capability literature and quantitatively evaluate what factors contribute to the (de-)escalation of near crises, using a dataset of involving at least one great power between 1995 and 2015. The patterns of near-crisis initiation and management confirm some of the expectations from both power transition theory and power cycle theory. They evaluate three near-crisis cases to stimulate future research on the connection between dynamics of capability and (de-)escalation at the near-crisis stage.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Conflict Prevention
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages305-323
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781803920849
ISBN (Print)9781803920832
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • Conflict escalation
  • Conflict management
  • Great powers
  • Military capability
  • Near crises
  • Power transition theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Great power politics and the dynamics of capability: the prevention of near-crisis escalation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this