Abstract
Patient choices and plans may sometimes carry increased risk or include alternatives that individual physicians feel uncomfortable supporting or recommending. We consider in this commentary how the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and nonmaleficence can be balanced using, among other examples, the choice by some for a home birth. We discuss how absolute rather than relative risk should guide individuals' evaluation of patient choices, and how in some circumstances the value and safety added by a physician's participation may outweigh a potentially small increment in absolute risk that a particular patient choice carries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1179-1182 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Home birth: What are physicians' ethical obligations when patient choices may carry increased risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver