Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How Experiments See Fluctuations of Native Proteins: Perspective from an Exact Model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Proteins undergo fluctuations under native conditions. Many lines of evidence are usually interpreted as implying that fluctuations are small excursions away from the native structure. By definition, fluctuations from the native conformation are small increases in free energy. But if protein folding energy landscapes are bumpy, such fluctuations could involve highly nonnative but compact "misfolded" structures, even while the excursions in energy are small. Using a model in which we can rigorously study fluctuations and rugged energy landscapes, we ask whether current experimental measures of structure, such as X-ray crystallographic Patterson maps and Debye-Waller factors or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectra, could detect bumpy landscapes. We find that even a substantial population of highly nonnative transients will generally be masked by the heavy averaging implicit in current experiments. This means that, in contrast to current interpretations, very nonnative or Misfold Fluctuations of native proteins may exist but are escaping experimental detection. A positive implication is that structure determination is robust to the presence of much conformational noise.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-164
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • Conformational plasticity
  • Debye-waller factor
  • NMR NOESY
  • Rugged energy landscape
  • X-ray crystallography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Experiments See Fluctuations of Native Proteins: Perspective from an Exact Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this