Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hydrogel Spacer Application Technique, Patient Tolerance and Impact on Prostate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Christopher M. Pieczonka
  • , Neil Mariados
  • , John E. Sylvester
  • , Lawrence I. Karsh
  • , Richard S. Hudes
  • , David C. Beyer
  • , Steven M. Kurtzman
  • , Jeffrey A. Bogart
  • Associated Medical Professionals of NY
  • 21st Century Oncology
  • The Urology Center of Colorado
  • Chesapeake Urology Associates d/b/a Chesapeake Urology Research Associates (The Prostate Center)
  • Arizona Oncology Services
  • Urological Surgeons of Northern California Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluate the safety, tolerability and impact on therapy of an absorbable hydrogel perirectal spacer (SpaceOAR® system) designed to reduce the rectal radiation dose during prostate cancer radiotherapy. Methods: A multicenter, pivotal, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 222 men with stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer treated to 79.2 Gy with image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy in 44 fractions. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive fiducial markers and perirectal spacer injection (spacer group) or fiducial markers alone (control group). Spacer placement, tolerability, perirectal space creation, impact on rectal dose and impact on quality of life were assessed. Results: Most spacer procedures were conducted with the patient under general or local anesthesia. Procedures were rated easy or very easy in 98.7% of cases with a 99.3% success rate. Mild transient rectal events were noted in 10% of patients in the spacer group (eg pain, discomfort). Mean perirectal space was 12.6 mm after implant and 10.9 mm at 12.4 weeks with absorption at 12 months. A 25% or greater reduction in rectal V70 dose was produced in 97.3% of patients in the spacer group. The spacer group experienced a significant reduction in late rectal toxicity severity (p=0.044) as well as lower rates of decrease in bowel quality of life at 6, 12 and 15 months compared to the control group. There were no unanticipated adverse spacer effects or spacer related adverse events. Conclusions: Hydrogel spacer application was straightforward and repeatable, resulting in consistent perirectal space creation and rectal dose reduction. Spacer application has the potential to improve prostate radiotherapy outcomes and enable advanced radiotherapy protocols.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-146
Number of pages6
JournalUrology Practice
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Keywords

  • Hydrogel
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Radiotherapy
  • Rectum
  • Toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydrogel Spacer Application Technique, Patient Tolerance and Impact on Prostate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this