Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of patient–provider race, ethnicity, and gender concordance on cancer screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

  • Jyoti Malhotra
  • , David Rotter
  • , Jennifer Tsui
  • , Adana A.M. Llanos
  • , Bijal A. Balasubramanian
  • , Kitaw Demissie
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

104 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic minorities experience lower rates of cancer screening compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). Previous studies evaluating the role of patient–provider race, ethnicity, or gender concordance in cancer screening have been inconclusive. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), data from 2003 to 2010 were assessed for associations between patient–provider race, ethnicity, and/or gender concordance and, screening (American Cancer Society guidelines) for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to examine associations of interest. Results: Of the 32,041 patient–provider pairs in our analysis, more than 60% of the patients were NHW, 15% were non-Hispanic black (NHB), and 15% were Hispanic. Overall, patients adherent to cancer screening were more likely to be non-Hispanic, better educated, married, wealthier, and privately insured. Patient–provider gender discordance was associated with lower rates of breast [OR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76–0.90], cervical (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.91), and colorectal cancer (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79–0.90) screening in all patients. This association was also significant after adjusting for racial and/or ethnic concordance. Conversely, among NHWs and NHBs, patient–provider racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with screening. Among Hispanics, patient–provider ethnic discordant pairs had higher breast (58% vs. 52%) and colorectal cancer (45% vs. 39%) screening rates compared with concordant pairs. Conclusions: Patient–provider gender concordance positively affected cancer screening. Patient–provider ethnic concordance was inversely associated with receipt of cancer screening among Hispanics. This counter-intuitive finding requires further study. Impact: Our findings highlight the importance of gender concordance in improving cancer screening rates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1804-1811
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of patient–provider race, ethnicity, and gender concordance on cancer screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this