Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impacts of cash transfer and “cash plus” programs on self- perceived stress in Africa: Evidence from Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzania

  • Ghana LEAP 1000 Evaluation Team
  • , Tanzania Adolescent Cash Plus Evaluation Team
  • , Malawi SCT Evaluation Team
  • University of Nairobi
  • United Nations Children's Fund
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • American Institutes for Research
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Poverty and poor mental health are closely linked. Cash transfers have significantly expanded globally. Given their objectives around poverty reduction and improving food security, a major chronic stressor in Africa, cash transfers may affect mental health outcomes. We examine impacts of three large-scale government cash transfer or cash plus programs in Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzania on self-perceived stress using an innovative, newly adapted measure for rural African settings. Linear regression models were used to estimate treatment impacts. We find that cash transfers reduced self-perceived stress in Malawi, but programs in Ghana and Tanzania had no impacts on self-perceived stress. These mixed findings, combined with recent reviews on cash transfers and mental health, suggest that cash transfers may play a role in improving mental health. However, cash alone may not be sufficient to overcome many challenges related to poverty, and complementary programming may also be needed to improve mental health.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101403
JournalSSM - Population Health
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Cash-transfer
  • Ghana
  • Malawi
  • Mental health
  • Poverty
  • Stress
  • Tanzania

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts of cash transfer and “cash plus” programs on self- perceived stress in Africa: Evidence from Ghana, Malawi, and Tanzania'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this