Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In-Hospital Mortality Following Open and Closed Long Bone Fracture: A Comparative Study

  • Adam Adler
  • , Matthew R. Boylan
  • , Carl Rosenberg
  • , Robert Pivec
  • , Bhaveen H. Kapadia
  • , Vidushan Nadarajah
  • , Qais Naziri
  • , Steven F. Harwin
  • , Carl B. Paulino
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open fracture is a serious orthopaedic injury that can lead to significant patient morbidity and mortality. There is limited data on the mortality risk for open compared to closed long bone fracture.

METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all patients who were admitted with a long bone fracture in the United States between 1998 and 2010. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of mortality.

RESULTS: After adjusting for age, gender, race, insurance, and comorbidities, the HR of mortality was 2.89 (95% CI, 2.56-3.28; p<0.001) for open compared to closed fracture. Stratified by anatomical site, the HR of mortality for open compared to fracture was 3.43 for femur (95% CI, 2.78-4.23; p<0.001), 2.81 for tibia or fibula (95% CI, 2.17-3.64; p<0.001), 2.54 for humerus (95% CI, 1.81-3.56; p<0.001), and 1.56 for radius or ulna (95% CI, 1.10-2.23; p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS: This data suggests that open fracture carries a worse prognosis compared to closed fracture at the same anatomical site.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-342
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical Technology International
Volume26
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In-Hospital Mortality Following Open and Closed Long Bone Fracture: A Comparative Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this