Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Influence of PACE score and conduction disturbances in the incidence of early new onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation

  • Ermengol Vallès
  • , Julio Martí-Almor
  • , Nuria Grau
  • , Benjamin Casteigt
  • , Begoña Benito
  • , Sandra Cabrera
  • , Oscar Alcalde
  • , Eva Benito
  • , Deva Bas
  • , Javi Conejos
  • , Paula Cabero
  • , Cristina Soler
  • , Xavier Duran
  • , Roger Fan
  • , Jesus Jimenez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Patients undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical flutter (AFL) have a high incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to analyze the influence of PACE score to predict new onset AF in this subset of patients to stratify thromboembolic risk. Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, patients undergoing CTI ablation for AFL and without history of AF were prospectively included. All patients were monitored continuously by implantable loop recorder and followed by remote monitoring. Results: Overall 48 patients were included. New onset AF rate at 12 months was 56.3%. We observed two very strong independent predictors for new onset AF: a PACE score ≥ 30 (HR:6.9; 95% CI:1.71–27.91; p = 0.007) and an HV interval ≥ 55 (HR:11.86; 95% CI:2.57–54.8; p = 0.002). Conclusions: The incidence of newly diagnosed AF is high in patients with AFL after CTI ablation, and can occur early. A high PACE score and/or long HV interval predict even higher risk, and may be useful in the decision for empiric long-term anticoagulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-422
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of cardiology
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation
  • Predictors
  • Risk score

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of PACE score and conduction disturbances in the incidence of early new onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this