Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrating Multimodal Neuroimaging of Error Monitoring to Estimate Future Anxiety in Adolescents

  • Emilio Alejandro Valadez
  • , Stefania Conte
  • , John E. Richards
  • , Yi Feng
  • , Lucrezia Liuzzi
  • , Marco McSweeney
  • , Enda Tan
  • , George A. Buzzell
  • , Santiago Morales
  • , Anderson M. Winkler
  • , Elise M. Cardinale
  • , Lauren K. White
  • , Daniel S. Pine
  • , Nathan A. Fox
  • University of Southern California
  • University of South Carolina
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of British Columbia
  • Florida International University
  • University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
  • Catholic University of America
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and associated with heightened error monitoring, the detection of one’s mistakes. However, error monitoring, anxiety, and their associations change throughout adolescence, limiting the ability to estimate future anxiety trajectories during this period. OBJECTIVE To ascertain whether measures of error monitoring obtained via the integration of electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) improve estimations of future anxiety compared with EEG or fMRI alone, in adolescents with or without a history of behaviorally inhibited temperament. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This longitudinal cohort study was conducted at a university research laboratory and government research hospital. Study assessments took place between January 2014 and July 2019, and data analyses were completed in January 2025. A community sample of infants completed a laboratory screening at age 4 months. A subset of these infants was oversampled to maximize variability of early temperament and followed up throughout adolescence. At ages 13 and 15 years, participants completed a flanker task during an EEG session and separate fMRI session. Brain activity at age 13 years and its change from 13 to 15 years of age were evaluated as potential risk factors for anxiety. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Change in anxiety from age 13 to 15 years as measured using clinical interviews and questionnaires. Hypotheses were formulated after data collection. RESULTS Analyses included 176 adolescents with neuroimaging data (92 females at birth [52.3%]; 5 Asian individuals [2.8%], 21 Black or African American individuals [11.9%], 11 Hispanic or Latino individuals [6.3%], 133 White individuals [75.6%], and 6 individuals of other [3.4%] race and ethnicity). Among neural variables (EEG-only, fMRI-only, and EEG-fMRI fusion), only the EEG-fMRI fusion scores explained additional variance in anxiety change scores (change in R2 = 0.25; P = .001) beyond demographics (sex, racial and ethnic minority status) and anxiety at age 13 years. Planned follow-up analyses revealed that early temperament interacted with dorsal anterior cingulate activity at age 13 years (β = 0.40; B = 8.77; 95% CI, 0.74-16.79; P = .03) and with changes in posterior cingulate activity (β = −0.42; B = −16.89; 95% CI, –28.21 to –5.57; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that integrating multimodal neuroimaging measures of error monitoring was associated with improved estimations of future anxiety in youths over and above each modality separately. Early temperament interacted with error monitoring to further differentiate anxiety trajectories; yet, these interactions differed across brain regions, highlighting the value of incorporating the complementary temporal and spatial information of EEG and fMRI.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2539133
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume8
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating Multimodal Neuroimaging of Error Monitoring to Estimate Future Anxiety in Adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this